November 11, 2009

No  objection to FDI from Mauritius: FIPB

In a welcome move, the Foreign Investment Promotion Board (“FIPB”) has pulled up the Department of Revenue (the “Department”)for rejecting Foreign Direct Investment (‘FDI’) proposals routed through Mauritius on the apprehension that such investments are so routed for “treaty shopping” and communicated that there was a “conscious policy decision” to override such objections from the Department.

In the past few months, the Department has held a generic objection to proposals routed through Mauritius, arguing that such investment proposals were structured for tax avoidance and involved “treaty shopping” under the India-Mauritius Tax Treaty to obtain beneficial treatment for capital gains income and thus, cost the exchequer valuable tax revenue.  To such argument, the FIPB replied that the India-Mauritius Tax Treaty is still valid and operational and thus the Department’s objection on such grounds is unacceptable.

As a consequence of holding such objection to investments routed through Mauritius, a variety of FDI proposals, have been opposed by the Department on such grounds and in some cases even rejected or deferred by the FIPB, causing unwarranted trouble for foreign investors.

A recent example being the application by Goldman Sachs, the US financial services group sought a composite approval for any new investment in India for rendering services as a non-banking financial company, however the Department opposed the application stating that ‘such an approval would amount to giving the green light to treaty shopping1. Another example being the deferral of the application made by Analjit Singh and Asim Ghosh to part-sell their minority stake in Vodafone Essar2.

The stand taken by the FIPB is consistent with the stand taken on the same issue about a year back, when the Department made repeated objections to FDI proposals routed through Mauritius and other jurisdictions for fear of “treaty shopping”. Please refer to our hotline ‘’Mauritius is OKAY says FIPB” dated November 11, 2008 on the same.

The ‘treaty shopping’ line of argument adopted by the Department is difficult to understand especially when even the judiciary has time and again upheld the validity of the India-Mauritius Tax Treaty and the capital gains exemption there-under. The exemption under the India-Mauritius Treaty was upheld by the Supreme Court in Azadi Bachaco Andolan case3 and has been reiterated recently in the Tribunal ruling in Saraswati Holding Corporation case4.    

It is pertinent to note the increasing aggressiveness of the Department and the tax authorities in India. In an unprecedented move, the tax authorities have filed an objection at the Delhi High Court, which is considering a demerger scheme involving Vodafone Essar for fears of potential loss of tax on account of the demerger of the towers owned by Vodafone Essar into Indus Towers5. These reports go a long way to show that the tax authorities are treading a dangerous path which could adversely affect FDI inflows into India.

However, the stand of the FIPB is surely going to be welcomed and supported by foreign investors keen on participating in the Indian economy. 

Source: News report in Business Standard dated November 7, 2009 [Stop ‘treaty shopping’ denials for FDI: FIPB tells revenue dept]

____________________

1 Source: News report dated September 10, 2009 [http://www.mydigitalfc.com/policy/goldman-sachs-plan-fails-treaty-shopping-test-794]

2 Source News report dated October 24, 2009

3 263 ITR 706

4 MANU/ID/0050/2009

5 Source: News report in Live Mint dated November 6, 2009

 

 

-        Neha Sinha & Parul Jain

 

You may direct your comments to Ramya Krishnan-AniL

+91 900465 0363

 

Management by Trust in a Democratic Enterprise: A Law Firm Shapes Organizational Behavior to Create Competitive Advantage, Global Business and Organizational Excellence, Sep 2009

NDA: A different approach by Shyamal Majumdar, Business Standard, July 23, 2009.

A law firm head spends his time studying organisational behavior.

Named by Pacific Business Press as Asian-Counsel Firm of the Year 2009 for the practice areas of Private Equity and Taxation in India.

Ranked highest on ‘Quality’ in the recent Financial Times-RSG Consulting survey of Indian law firms

 ●

NDAite wins, for the fourth year in succession, the global competition at the International Bar Association.

>>>

 

Welcome to connect with us at interesting conferences, seminars and events.

>>>

 

Introducing NDA Dialawgue and Deal Destination.

Technology @ Nishith Desai Associates, Part I & Part II

 

Vyapak Desai on Takeover Code

Vyapak Desai on RBI operationalizes IDR regulations

>>>

 

Click here to view Hotline archives.

Second missed call: Bharti Airtel fails to reconnect with MTN, Oct 09, 2009

BHARTI-MTN: Ringing The Bell From Asia To Africa, June 5, 2009

>>>

Google sued by Bharat matrimony over use of marks as keywords, World Trademark Review, Prerak Hora, Oct 12, 2009

The warranty side of software license and service agreements, CIO, Huzefa Tavawalla & Vivek Kathpalia, Sep 30, 2009

Doing Business in India

Venture Capital and Private Equity in India: A Primer and Select Research

Mergers & Acquisitions in India

Dispute Resolution in India

Intellectual Property in India

eCommerce Taxation in India

Special Economic Zones

BPO Report

India: Structural Strategy

Inversion - The Basic Facts

Venture Capital at Crossroads

 

Our email newsletters – Hotlines are very popular for their insights and analysis. Sign-up to receive Hotlines on the following – Tax, CorpSec, HR, Dispute Resolution and our regular updates such as M&A Labs, IP, Pharma, Media, Telecom Updates and Budget and Policy Analyses.

 

Please visit www.nishithdesai.com to access our Research online.

 

Unsubscribe

 

Feedback

Disclaimer: The contents of this hotline should not be construed as legal opinion. View detailed disclaimer.

This Hotline provides general information existing at the time of preparation. The Hotline is intended as a news update and Nishith Desai Associates neither assumes nor accepts any responsibility for any loss arising to any person acting or refraining from acting as a result of any material contained in this Hotline. It is recommended that professional advice be taken based on the specific facts and circumstances. This Hotline does not substitute the need to refer to the original pronouncements. 

This is not a Spam mail. You have received this mail because you have either requested for it or someone must have suggested your name. Since India has no anti-spamming law, we refer to the US directive, which states that a mail cannot be considered Spam if it contains the sender's contact information, which this mail does. In case this mail doesn't concern you, please unsubscribe from mailing list.